Thursday, March 19, 2020
Outstanding argumentative essay topics
Outstanding argumentative essay topics Argumentative essay topics It is not an easy task to choose good argumentative essay topics if you are interested in getting excellent grades. Where to start the search from? You can start your search with taking a certain quality (creative, lazy, diligent, and curious, etc.) and defining it using your own experience. Try to remember the situations in which you demonstrated this quality. Besides, think about the moments when you lacked it or had it challenged. It is important to understand what your defining characteristics are. It will be much easier to choose the best argument essay topics. Try looking for surprising and unexpected topics. Collect your thoughts and remember different things that have happened to you. It can be a funny incident from your childhood when you could not get out of some refrigerator box, or any other thing that no one could expect from you. Good argumentative essay examples also show that it is efficient to choose the topic related to the activity you are keen on. The readers will be involved into your story if it shows you from an unknown perspective: like a baseball player interested in knitting. Furthermore, it is great to choose a characteristic or trait that even the people who know you for a long time are not aware of. Tell about the size of your foot which is too small for your height, or choose any other impressive characteristic. Build your top-notch argument essay on the interesting topics. Do not use the routine threadbare things which will bore the readers to death. The examples of mundane topics are the following: How I Have Overcome My Fear of Public Transport, The Day I Helped My Neighbor Maid Clean the Hotel Rooms, My Friends Think I Weigh Too Much to Be Sensitive, I Have Never Tried any Informal Things Living in Surf City. There are numerouss of argumentative essays that can be found online. Read them not to be confused and embarrassed. Skim through the essays written by students from all over the world to feel what you can tell to your readers. Trigger your own ideas looking through the ideas of other students. Use the examples of argumentative essays to improve your style of writing and the skill of working on the structure of the text. Think about the problems and obstacles you had on your way. Think over the problem and get an exciting story to write. Look through some argumentative essay to see what people write about phobias, bad luck, changes, challenges and mistakes. An engaging story starts from a little personal anecdote. Most Interesting Topics for Argumentative Essays We have created a list of the most interesting topics for argumentative essays for you to be able to create a true masterpiece and get the excellent grade. Choosing one topic from this list, you will find many reasonable arguments and prepare an exemplary essay. Society 1.   How winning the lottery can change the life of a person? 2.   Why is the death penalty such a controversial issue in the contemporary society? 3.   What is the role of fashion nowadays? 4.   Why do so many people decide to be atheists? 5.   Pros and cons of gun control. 6.   The key reasons to become a member of the fraternity or sorority at the college. 7.   What are the possible drawbacks of the democracy? 8.   Why living forever is boring? 9.   What are the benefits of the highly competitive environment? 10.   Should the working mothers have some privileges? 11.   Should the government of different countries make the control of refuges stricter? 12.   The concept of cultural shock: Why it is so hard to accept the culture of other people? 13.   Abortion as an ethical concept. 14.   Should the government improve the antiracist policies? 15.   Why is the sexual orientation still a burning issue in the contemporary tolerant society? Technology 1.   Are people too dependent on the modern technology in the 21st century? 2.   Does the internet slow down the moral development? 3.   What impact does the social media have on the human life? 4.   E-books vs classic books: Benefits and shortcomings. 5.   The phenomenon of Instagram. Why are people becoming more dependent? 6.   How can the robots make the human life easier? 7.   The reasons for cryptocurrency appearance. 8.   How long should we wait before the electronic money will substitute the paper one? 9.   Cyberbullying: What areas should be protected? 10.   Should the children of elementary schools be prevented from computed games? 11.   Does the social media tend to make us lonelier? 12.   Should the Internet content be more restricted? 13.   The negative consequences of the artificial intelligence development. 14.   Are people dependent on the comments in social networks? Education 1.   College education: Pros and cons. 2.   Should the membership in fraternity influence the student`s performance? 3.   How the college dropouts Bill Gates and Steve Jobs could reach success? 4.   If compulsory homework is canceled, will children study at home? 5.   What are the essential characteristics of the student-professor relationships? 6.   If the child does not like the particular subject, what measures should be taken? 7.   Should college authorities be loyal towards the sexual orientation of the students? 8.   What are the negative aspects of conformism in the educational environment? 9.   What subjects should be optional? 10.   How the prof-orientation tests help the students select the career. 11.   Free college education: Advantages and disadvantages. 12.   Should college athletes be paid? 13.   Should children be taught housekeeping at school? 14.   Should children be tested for drugs at school? 15.   Is homework an effective instrument to gain knowledge? Health 1.   The benefits and shortcomings of the US healthcare system. 2.   Why is the breakfast a must for maintaining good health? 3.   Should people have the right to death? Pros and cons of euthanasia. 4.   What are the possible benefits of shortening the working day to six hours? 5.   Obesity in the United States: Causes and consequences of the problem. 6.   Should free mental therapy be provided to the children of school age? 7.   What kinds of sports are dangerous for the human health? 8.   The pros and cons of being vegan. 9.   The dangerous consequences of human cloning. 10.   The danger of fast food: To eat or not to eat. 11.   Should marijuana be legalized? 12.   The impact of Obamacare on the US society. 13.   How can a good sleep influence the human life? 14.   Shopping: Addiction or hobby? 15.   Does the lifespan depend on genetics? Family 1.   Should same-gender people have the rights to raise a child? 2.   To what extent should be parents involved in the life of their child? 3.   Should people undergo some tests before becoming the parents? 4.   How the parents` inability to raise up a child should be punished? 5.   To what extent are the parents responsible for the crimes of their children? 6.   Should men and women have the same rights in marriage? 7.   Is it ethical to read the child`s diary? 8.   Should parents allow their children plastic surgery if the latter want to fix the obvious defects? 9.   Do parents have the rights to tell their child whom to date with? 10.   Should children have the right to decide with whom to stay after divorce? 11.   At what age parents can allow their child to try alcohol? 12.   Why having more than five children is considered irresponsible? 13.   Should children be obliged to help their elderly parents financially? 14.   How can parents cope with the drug addiction of their child? Literature, Cinema, Art, and Other Interesting Topics for Argumentative Essays 1.   How the level of censorship influences the development of art in a certain country? 2.   Are the movies of the 21st century became crueler? 3.   Why watching TV is the waste of time? 4.   Books vs movies: Key advantages and disadvantages. 5.   Do the actors playing the murderers and maniacs take some risk? 6.   Should parents take their children to the exhibitions with the nude pictures? 7.   Do all forms of art deserve for existence? 8.   How the books can broaden the human worldview? 9.   Do the famous artists have the innate talent or it is the hard work that helped them reach success? 10.   Plagiarism: What are the causes and consequences of using the works of other people? We do hope that you choosing one of the interesting topics for argumentative essays mentioned above, you will impress your professor. Indeed, each of them opens a huge field of research and if you want to achieve success, just dedicate some time and efforts to writing your essay.
Monday, March 2, 2020
The Art of Atomic Diplomacy
The Art of Atomic Diplomacy The term â€Å"atomic diplomacy†refers to a nation’s use of the threat of nuclear warfare to achieve its diplomatic and foreign policy goals. In the years following its first successful test of an atomic bomb in 1945, the United States federal government occasionally sought to use its nuclear monopoly as a non-military diplomatic tool. World War II: The Birth of Nuclear Diplomacy During World War II, the United States, Germany, the Soviet Union, and Great Britain were researching designs of an atomic bomb for use as the â€Å"ultimate weapon.†By 1945, however, only the United States developed a working bomb. On August 6, 1945, the United States exploded an atomic bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. In seconds, the blast leveled 90% of the city and killed an estimated 80,000 people. Three days later, on August 9, the U.S. dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki, killing an estimated 40,000 people. On August 15, 1945, Japanese Emperor Hirohito announced his nation’s unconditional surrender in the face of what he called â€Å"a new and most cruel bomb.†Without realizing it at the time, Hirohito had also announced the birth of nuclear diplomacy. The First Use of Atomic Diplomacy While U.S. officials had used the atomic bomb in order to force Japan to surrender, they also considered how the immense destructive power of nuclear weapons could be used to strengthen the nation’s advantage in postwar diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union. When U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt approved the development of the atomic bomb in 1942, he decided not to tell the Soviet Union about the project. After Roosevelt’s death in April 1945, the decision of whether to maintain the secrecy of the U.S. nuclear weapons program fell to President Harry Truman. In July 1945, President Truman, along with Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin, and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill met in the Potsdam Conference to negotiate governmental control of already defeated Nazi Germany and other terms for the end of World War II. Without disclosing any specific details about the weapon, President Truman mentioned the existence of an especially destructive bomb to Joseph Stalin, leader of the growing and already feared Communist Party. By entering the war against Japan in mid-1945, the Soviet Union placed itself in a position to play an influential part in the allied control of post-war Japan. While U.S. officials favored a U.S.-led, rather than a U.S.-Soviet shared occupation, they realized there was no way to prevent it. U.S. policymakers feared the Soviets might use its political presence in post-war Japan as a base for spreading communism throughout Asia and Europe. Without actually threatening Stalin with the atomic bomb, Truman hoped America’s exclusive control of nuclear weapons, as demonstrated by the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki would convince the Soviets to rethink their plans. In his 1965 book Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam, historian Gar Alperovitz contends that Truman’s atomic hints at the Potsdam meeting amounted to the first us of atomic diplomacy. Alperovitz argues that since the nuclear attacks on ​Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not needed to force the Japanese to surrender, the bombings were actually intended to influence postwar diplomacy with the Soviet Union. Other historians, however, contend that President Truman truly believed the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombing were needed to force the immediate unconditional surrender of Japan. The alternative, they argue would have been an actual military invasion of Japan with the potential cost of thousands of allied lives. US Covers Western Europe with a ‘Nuclear Umbrella’ Even if U.S. officials hoped the examples of Hiroshima and Nagasaki would spread Democracy rather than Communism throughout Eastern Europe and Asia, they were disappointed. Instead, the threat of nuclear weapons made the Soviet Union ever more intent on protecting its own borders with a buffer zone of communist-ruled countries. However, during the first several years after the end of World War II, the United States’ control of nuclear weapons was far more successful at creating lasting alliances in Western Europe. Even without placing large numbers of troops inside their borders, America could protect the Western Bloc nations under its â€Å"nuclear umbrella,†something the Soviet Union did not yet have. The assurance of peace for America and her allies under the nuclear umbrella would soon be shaken, however, as the U.S. lost its monopoly over nuclear weapons. The Soviet Union successfully tested its first atomic bomb in 1949, the United Kingdom in 1952, France in 1960, and the People’s Republic of China in 1964. Looming as a threat since Hiroshima, the Cold War had started. Cold War Atomic Diplomacy Both the United States and the Soviet Union frequently used atomic diplomacy during the first two decades of the Cold War. In 1948 and 1949, during the shared occupation of postwar Germany, The Soviet Union blocked the U.S. and other Western Allies from using all roads, railroads, and canals serving much of West Berlin. President Truman responded to the blockade by stationing several B-29 bombers that â€Å"could†have carried nuclear bombs if needed to U.S. airbases near Berlin. However, when the Soviets did not back down and lower the blockade, the U.S. and its Western Allies carried out the historic Berlin Airlift that flew food, medicine, and other humanitarian supplies to the people of West Berlin. Shortly after the start of the Korean War in 1950, President Truman again deployed the nuclear-ready B-29s as a signal to the Soviet Union of U.S. resolve to maintain democracy in the region. In 1953, near the end of the war, President Dwight D. Eisenhower considered, but chose not to use atomic diplomacy to gain an advantage in peace negotiations. And then the Soviets famously turned the tables in the Cuban Missile Crisis, the most visible and dangerous case of atomic diplomacy. In response to the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion of 1961 and the presence of U.S. nuclear missiles in Turkey and Italy, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev shipped nuclear missiles to Cuba in October 1962. U.S President John F. Kennedy responded by ordering a total blockade to prevent additional Soviet missiles from reaching Cuba and demanding that all nuclear weapons already on the island be returned to the Soviet Union. The blockade produced several tense moments as ships believed to be carrying nuclear weapons were confronted and turned away by the U.S. Navy. After 13 days of hair-raising atomic diplomacy, Kennedy and Khrushchev came to a peaceful agreement. The Soviets, under U.S. supervision, dismantled their nuclear weapons in Cuba and shipped them home. In return, the United States promised never again to invade Cuba without military provocation and removed its nuclear missiles from Turkey and Italy. As a result of the Cuban Missile Crisis, the U.S. imposed severe trade and travel restrictions against Cuba that remained in effect until eased by President Barack Obama in 2016. The MAD World Shows the Futility of Atomic Diplomacy By the mid-1960s, the ultimate futility of atomic diplomacy had become evident. The nuclear weapons arsenals of the United States and the Soviet Union had become virtually equal in both size and destructive power. In fact, the security of both nations, as well as global peacekeeping, came to depend on a dystopian principle called â€Å"mutually assured destruction†or MAD. While President Richard Nixon briefly considered using the threat of nuclear weapons to hasten the end of the Vietnam War, he knew the Soviet Union would disastrously retaliate on behalf of North Vietnam and that both international and American public opinion would never accept the idea of using the atomic bomb. Since both the United States and the Soviet Union were aware that any full-scale first nuclear strike would result in the complete annihilation of both countries, the temptation to use nuclear weapons during a conflict was greatly diminished. As public and political opinion against the use or even the threatened use of nuclear weapons grew louder and more influential, the limits of atomic diplomacy became obvious. So while it is rarely practiced today, atomic diplomacy probably prevented the MAD scenario several times since World War II. 2019: US Withdraws from Cold War Arms Control Treaty On August 2, 2019, the United States formally withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) with Russia. Originally ratified on 1 June 1988, the INF limited the development of ground-based missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometers (310 to 3,417 miles) but did not apply to air- or sea-launched missiles. Their uncertain range and their ability to reach their targets within 10 minutes made the mistaken use of the missiles a constant source of fears during the Cold War era. Ratification of the INF launched a lengthy subsequent process during which both the United States and Russia reduced their nuclear arsenals. In exiting the INF Treaty, the Donald Trump administration cited reports that Russia had been violating the treaty by developing of a new land-based, nuclear-capable cruise missile. After long denying the existence of such missiles, Russia recently claimed the missile’s range is less than 500 kilometers (310 miles) and thus not in violation of the INF Treaty. In announcing the US’ formal withdrawal from the INF treaty, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo placed sole responsibility for the demise of the nuclear treaty on Russia. â€Å"Russia failed to return to full and verified compliance through the destruction of its noncompliant missile system,†he said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)